Republicans don't want military spending cuts and Democrats don't want cuts in social programs. The best thing to do would be doubling or tripling the cuts, but compromise tends to work in the other direction.
Thus one should not be surprised by this can-kicking idea: Republicans Propose Job Freeze to Avert Defense Cuts
Republican members of the House and Senate Armed Services committees revived a proposal to avert automatic spending cuts by reducing the federal workforce through attrition and freezing congressional salaries.Sequestration a Brainchild of Republicans
The legislation would save $85 billion through Sept. 30, the same amount as the across-the-board cuts that would be divided between defense and domestic programs, said Senator Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire. She was among lawmakers presenting the plan at a news conference Wednesday in Washington.
The automatic cuts, called sequestration, will take effect March 1 unless Congress and President Barack Obama agree on an alternative. Tuesday, Obama urged lawmakers to propose a short-term package of reductions and tax-code changes, such as limiting tax breaks, to delay the reductions.
“The president gave us a proposal that cuts defense spending once again,” Representative Howard “Buck” McKeon of California, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said at the news conference. He called Obama’s plan “irresponsible, unacceptable.”
Excuse me for pointing out the truth: Sequestration is a brainchild of a Republican House. Instead of accepting 10-1 spending cuts to tax hikes that was on the table last year, Republicans kicked the can to 2013 believing Romney to be a shoo-in for president.
It did not work out that way, as I warned at the time. Now, Obama's "I am willing to make hard choices" offer is off the table (assuming of course it was ever really on the table).
Now Republicans whine about the automatic spending cuts to the military that they agreed to (expecting them to go away under Romney). And in the meantime, Republicans accepted a boatload of tax hikes and got absolutely nothing in return.
Defense Cut Fearmongering
Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stepped up to the plate, fearmongering about the defense cuts. “My fear is that there is a dangerous and callous attitude that is developing among some Republicans and some Democrats that these dangerous cuts can be allowed to take place in order to blame the other party for the consequences,” said Panetta.
It's long overdue we get rid of Neanderthals like Panetta, so I look forward to the appointment of Chuck Hagel as defense secretary.
Meanwhile, Senator Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire got into the act with the message “Our defense should not be used as a bargaining chip because of other policy aspirations”.
Senator Kelly is another hypocrite that wants more military spending but no tax hikes to pay for them.
Tax Rift Hardens as Sequester Nears
Fearmongering of another sort is now making mainstream media waves. For example, please consider this headline news story: Tax Rift Hardens as 'Sequester' Nears
A rift over how to replace the automatic budget cuts known as “sequestration” hardened on Sunday, as Democratic and Republican leaders clashed over including tax increases in any proposal to replace the looming spending reductions set to kick in on March 1.Fearmongering by Both Parties
“We’ve got a spending problem, everybody knows it,” Cantor said. Referencing the beginning-of-the-year deal to avert the so-called “fiscal cliff” of tax increases and spending cuts, Cantor said Obama “just got his tax hike on the wealthy. And you can’t in this town every three months raise taxes. Again, every time, that’s his response.”
Obama is almost certain to use his Tuesday night State of the Union address to urge a resolution to the sequester, which grew out of the 2011 agreement to raise the U.S. debt ceiling. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, a rising Republican star, will give his party’s response.
Obama on Saturday used his weekly address to warn that the sequester would deliver a “huge blow to middle-class families and our economy as a whole.” His warning came a day after the White House released a list of programs that would suffer under the automatic cuts. Benefits for low-income Americans would be cut, government food inspectors would be laid off and the FBI would lose 1,000 officers, the White House said.
The aerospace industry has also been a vocal critic of the sequester. The president of the Aerospace Industries Association, which represents Boeing Co. and Lockheed Martin Corp. among other companies, is scheduled to join officials of health and educational groups at a Washington news conference on Monday to urge lawmakers and Obama for a permanent replacement for the sequester.
Both parties, as expected, are now in on the fearmongering act. Recall that the spending cuts via sequestration were scheduled only because the parties could not agree on any budget cuts last year. They still cannot agree this year even though "We’ve got a spending problem, everybody knows it".
It's only February 10. The sequestration cuts occur on March 1. In political terms that date is the equivalent of light-years away (yes I know light years are a measure of distance). My point is there is still plenty of time to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
Victory is sequestration, the best possible outcome. But don't count on it. Following still more fear-mongering by both parties, another do-nothing can-kicking compromise is likely.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock