Showdown in Cleveland: Unions Refuse Nominal Pay Cuts
In typical fashion, and not understanding how well off they are compared to the private sector, unions have rejected nominal salary concessions in Cleveland.
Please consider Cleveland Unions Have One Week To Accept Concessions Or Face Layoffs.
Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson plans to follow through on layoff notices issued late last month unless unions agree to sacrifices. Ideastream’s Bill Rice reports.Jackson Overly Generous
The mayor sent a total of about 160 layoff notices out just before Christmas in order to meet the a two- week notification deadline to cut employees loose after next Monday. At that time, the Cleveland Fraternal Order of Police – which represents supervisors - had rejected the mayors’ proposed concessions. Shortly after that, the Patrolman’s Union followed suit, as did the EMS union. Those votes will mean the city will lay off just under a hundred officers and paramedics, and demote several higher ranking police personnel.
Jackson has asked all union employees to make concessions equaling a 4.17 percent across the board pay cut. He calls the proposed concessions an opportunity to preserve jobs, and says it’s up to the unions to decide whether there will be layoffs.
Jackson: “Realistically I’ve been able to give them a proposal that would avert layoffs, that would not impact their membership. And those who choose to go along with that, then that is what will happen. Those don’t, the effective date of the layoff is in mid-January.”
Jackson is too generous. A 4.17% pay cut is just a down payment for what needs to happen. Unless and until public unions give up defined benefit plans along with agreeing to wages that will not bankrupt cities, these meager cuts will not solve anything.
Jackson's starting point should be more along the lines of 20% pay cuts and termination of defined benefit pension plans for new hires.
Eventually it is going to come to something like that, so why not ask for it upfront? The other reasonable alternative is for Cleveland to declare bankruptcy and let the unions see what they can get in bankruptcy court.
"Mark" who sent me the link writes:
Amazingly enough, cities, counties and states are coming to the conclusion that, if you don't have any money, you can't pay anyone to work for you.Mike "Mish" Shedlock
How's that for Economics 101?
I wish the federal government would sign up for this "adult refresher course" as well.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
Disclaimer:The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.